Thursday, July 24, 2014

Buy Qualcomm Despite China Chaos - Qualcomm Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM) | Seeking Alpha

Buy Qualcomm Despite China Chaos - Qualcomm Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM) | Seeking Alpha

Buy Qualcomm Despite China Chaos

After the bell on Wednesday, Qualcomm (NASDAQ:QCOM) reported its third quarter earnings, and Wall Street was pretty unimpressed with the results, knocking shares down 4%. QCOM shares had been gaining some momentum ahead of this report with shares hitting a new 52-week high during the regular session. After this release, the momentum has likely come to an end, and in the immediate term, I would not be surprised to see shares trade all the back down to $75. As an investor in QCOM, this report was deeply disappointing; however, I believe the long term story is still intact as the world is increasingly mobile and reliant on smartphones. As the premier patent holder and chip marker, Qualcomm will profit from this trend. With its outsized cash balance, the stock is also very attractive value. On a drop below $77, I will probably add to my position and suggest you buy some as well.

In the third quarter, Qualcomm earned $1.44 on revenue of $6.81 billion, which compares favorably to consensus of $1.22 on sales of $6.52 billion (financial and operating data available here). Backing out a gain of $0.12 thanks to a favorable legal decision, earnings were $1.32, still better than estimates. EPS was up 40% year over year and 10% sequentially while revenue was up 9%. At face value, these numbers seem pretty solid, but some of the internals of the report were a bit weak. More importantly, Qualcomm's guidance was very disappointing, as was its commentary on China.

First though, let's examine the third quarter more closely. MSM chip shipments came in a solid 225 million, which was up 31% year over year. This growth is a sign of how robust the smartphone market remains; however, chip revenue jumped a relatively meager 17%. This obviously implies that average selling prices were significantly lower year over year. China has been fighting Qualcomm to cut prices, arguing it has violated antitrust laws, which could be a reason for this decline. Additionally, some players like Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are trying to build a presence, particularly towards the lower end of the market, which could be forcing QCOM to cut prices to maintain share. Average selling price data will be important to track in coming quarters to ensure QCOM is maintaining its near monopoly on the market.

Qualcomm also generates revenue by licensing its patents as it owns much of the intellectual property that 4G networks run on. Over the longer run, this business tend to correlate a bit with smart phone sales as the higher the number of the users, the larger the license fees. In fact, license revenue was surprisingly weak, down 3% year over year to $1.8 billion. This business has high margins (an 86% before tax margin this quarter), so profits fell by 5% compared to last year. I expect much of this decline can be attributed to China's efforts to get a better deal from Qualcomm (more below).

Finally, Qualcomm is the leading mobile chip company because it has out innovated the competition thanks to continued spending on R&D. While lower R&D boosts current income, it can devastate future results, which is why I always focus on it. Fortunately, Qualcomm maintains a robust R&D budget and is not cutting it simply to goose current results. R&D spending was up 11% year over year and is 18% of revenues (the same percentage as last year). With its large R&D budget, Qualcomm continues to invest in the business to ensure it maintains a technical edge over the competition.

Now while these numbers were generally good, guidance was relatively disappointing. In the past, Qualcomm has said Q4 should be the strongest quarter thanks to China's 4G LTE roll-out, but it appears the company was a bit too optimistic. It now expects to earn $1.20-$1.35 while the street was looking for $1.39. Its revenue mid-point of $6.95 billion compared to consensus of $7.15 billion. It also expects chip shipments to increase by less than 10% sequentially, which is disappointing considering the China upgrade and inventory stocking ahead of the Holiday Season. Simply put, this guidance was a miss and translates to full year estimates of $5.21-$5.36, which would be up 16-19% year over year. If we back out the $0.12 gain, QCOM's midpoint is $5.16 while I was hoping for closer to $5.20.

Finally, China is trying to win concessions from QCOM for lower fees, accusing it of antitrust activities. This probe is seen primarily as a negotiating ploy, and China has apparently escalated the situation. Qualcomm is accusing Chinese customers of not reporting all of the sales of licensed products to avoid paying Qualcomm. If true, this is a serious allegation and could significantly slow revenue growth in one of the world's largest and fastest markets. Qualcomm expects calendar 2014 device sales to be 1.3 billion while sales reported to Qualcomm will be in the 1.04 to 1.13 billion range. By my estimates, this problem with Chinese reporting could be cutting EPS by $0.25-35 over a 12 month period. Qualcomm needs to find a solution soon.

While the situation in China appears to be bordering chaos, it should also be noted Qualcomm has a ton of cash, $32.7 billion to be exact. This is up $600 million sequentially despite the repurchase of $1.35 billion in stock. Qualcomm anticipates repurchasing another $1 billion this quarter. These buybacks will help to accelerate earnings growth, and QCOM also offers a solid 2.1% dividend yield. Its cash hoard currently stands at $19.50 per share. Even with the problems in China, Qualcomm is a solid growth story thanks to secular tailwinds. The potential for more mobile devices, like watches, will only accelerate growth further, so I believe shares should be trading at least 14x earnings on an ex-cash basis or $92. At current prices, Qualcomm has over 15% of upside. China will be a drag, but Qualcomm is very inexpensive. I would be a buyer, not a seller, on weakness after this report



Stuart Don Levy

Friday, May 16, 2014

Apple Supplier Foxconn to Suspend Vietnam Operations for Three Days - WSJ.com

Apple Supplier Foxconn to Suspend Vietnam Operations for Three Days - WSJ.com
China's increasing militarism is having unintended consequences.  Foxconn is headquartered in Tiawan, is listed on the stock exchange and pays a dividiend.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304908304579565403763785422?mod=WSJ_qtoverview_wsjlatest&mg=reno64-wsj

Apple Supplier to Suspend Vietnam Operations

A motorcyclist rides past the entrance of the Taiwan headquarters of Foxconn in December. Reuters

HONG KONG—The world's biggest assembler of electronic devices, Foxconn, 2354.TW -1.27% will suspend most of its manufacturing operations in Vietnam for three days, after violent protests targeting Chinese factories in the country spilled over to the facilities of other global manufacturers.

Taiwan-based Foxconn, also known as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. 2317.TW +0.23% , is a major supplier for Apple Inc. AAPL -0.85% and other global consumer electronics companies. It has six units in Vietnam making computers, mobile handsets and components as well as trading and logistics operations.

"Employees at our manufacturing sites in Vietnam will take three days of leave from May 17 for safety reasons," Foxconn said Friday in a statement

A Foxconn official, who declined to be named, said most of its Chinese and Taiwanese executives in Vietnam have temporarily returned to their homelands even though the company's manufacturing sites haven't reported any damage.

Hundreds of businesses in Vietnam with no ties to the dispute have been swept up in the unrest. Taiwanese, South Korean, Japanese and Malaysian plants have been damaged and scores of people have been injured.

Taiwanese manufacturers have been particularly hard hit, with at least 200 factories looted or burned down, the island's government said Thursday.

Foxconn's moves came after the violent protests--sparked by an oil rig that a Chinese state-run company placed in a disputed part of the South China Sea waters—turned deadly, with at least two people said to have been killed.

Foxconn operates most of its factories in China, where it has more than one million workers. The company, which expanded production into Vietnam in 2007, located its units in the northern part of the country, according to its annual report. Foxconn declined to disclose the number of employees it has in Vietnam.

Write to Lorraine Luk at lorraine.luk@wsj.com



Stuart Don Levy

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Accounting for Earnings Manipulation - MoneyBeat - WSJ

Accounting for Earnings Manipulation - MoneyBeat - WSJ

Accounting for Earnings Manipulation

Don't think companies that lard chief executives pay packages with equity incentives are at risk of earnings manipulation? Accounting firms aren't taking any chances.

Including stock options, restricted stock and the like in compensation is meant to align management incentives with what's best for shareholders. The CEO whose future wealth depends on how well the firm's stock performs will think twice before doing anything rash, the thinking goes.

Yet CEOs with hefty stock packages can also have an incentive to juice results, although studies examining this issue have been somewhat inconclusive.

But a forthcoming paper in Contemporary Accounting Research by Yongtae Kim, Haidan Li and Siqi Li of Santa Clara University suggests accounting firms think the risk is real. Examining a large sample of firms, the three found that the more sensitive CEOs' wealth was to volatility in their companies' stock, the more accounting firms tended to charge for audits.

One reason behind that might be that auditors feel like they have to spend more time digging around for accounting irregularities. Another might be that they're more worried about missing those and getting sued, demanding higher payment for taking on that risk.



Stuart Don Levy

Sunday, May 4, 2014

What is the difference between a company's book value per share and its intrinsic value per share?


What is the difference between a company's book value per share and its intrinsic value per share?

Book value and intrinsic value are two ways to measure the value of a company.

In simple terms, book value is based on the value of total assets less the value of total liabilities - it attempts to measure the net assets a company has built up until the present time. In theory, this is the amount that the shareholders would receive if the company were to be completely liquidated. For example, if a company has $23.2 billion in assets and $19.3 billion in liabilities, the book value of the company would be the difference of $3.9 billion (book value). To express this number in terms of book value per share, simply take the book value and divide it by the number of outstanding shares. If a given company is currently trading below its book value, it is often considered to be undervalued.

There are, however, several problems that arise with the use of book value as a measure of value. For example, it would be unlikely that the value the company would receive in liquidation would be equal to the book value per share. Nevertheless, it can still be used as a useful benchmark to estimate how much a profitable company's stock might drop if the market turns sour on it.

Intrinsic value is a measure of value based on the future earnings a company is expected to generate for its investors - it attempts to measure the total net assets a company is expected to build in the future. It is considered the true value of the company from an investment standpoint and is calculated by taking the present value of the earnings (attributable to investors) that a company is expected to generate in the future, along with the future sale value of the company. The idea behind this measure is that the purchase of a stock entitles the owner to his or her share of the company's future earnings. If all of the future earnings are accurately known along with the final sale price, the company's true value can be calculated.

For example, if we assume that a company will be around for one year and generate $1,000 before being sold for $10,000, we can find the intrinsic value of the company. At the end of the year we will have received $11,000. If our required rate of return is 10%, then the present value today of the future earnings and sale price is $10,000. If we were to pay more than $10,000 for the company, our required rate of return would not be met.

To learn more, check out Value By The Book, A Guide to Stock Picking Strategies and the Ratio Analysis Tutorial.